<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Identify a Bad Web Directory</title>
	<link>http://searchengineoptimizationplus.com/2008/04/06/how-to-identify-a-bad-web-directory/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Free Image Hosting</title>
		<link>http://searchengineoptimizationplus.com/2008/04/06/how-to-identify-a-bad-web-directory/#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Image Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://searchengineoptimizationplus.com/2008/04/06/how-to-identify-a-bad-web-directory/#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>great, great article about web directories. As myself being a directory owner, I found those advices in your post very true and informative. I have also some "negative parts" in my directory which I have to fix, and in the future to avoid being penalized by google. I fully agree with you in the part with "reciprocal links", I thing google will probably spot those links very quickly. For now , are not penalized, but in the future , who know ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great, great article about web directories. As myself being a directory owner, I found those advices in your post very true and informative. I have also some &#8220;negative parts&#8221; in my directory which I have to fix, and in the future to avoid being penalized by google. I fully agree with you in the part with &#8220;reciprocal links&#8221;, I thing google will probably spot those links very quickly. For now , are not penalized, but in the future , who know ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Gadd</title>
		<link>http://searchengineoptimizationplus.com/2008/04/06/how-to-identify-a-bad-web-directory/#comment-4372</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Gadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://searchengineoptimizationplus.com/2008/04/06/how-to-identify-a-bad-web-directory/#comment-4372</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this article. It has made me think about my own directories and how I can improve them. I was not really aware of the footer links issue. On 1 directory I have now stopped allowing reciprocal links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this article. It has made me think about my own directories and how I can improve them. I was not really aware of the footer links issue. On 1 directory I have now stopped allowing reciprocal links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Building Services</title>
		<link>http://searchengineoptimizationplus.com/2008/04/06/how-to-identify-a-bad-web-directory/#comment-4354</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Building Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://searchengineoptimizationplus.com/2008/04/06/how-to-identify-a-bad-web-directory/#comment-4354</guid>
		<description>Nice article. It is also a good point to check a few sites that are already listed in a directory before deciding to submit sites. If their titles and descriptions look spammy ( excessive keywords, non proper English etc ) , it means that the editor is not paying much attention to his directory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. It is also a good point to check a few sites that are already listed in a directory before deciding to submit sites. If their titles and descriptions look spammy ( excessive keywords, non proper English etc ) , it means that the editor is not paying much attention to his directory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
